NEWS UPDATE Sudan: Abusive Warring Parties Acquire New Weapons Renew, Expand UN Arms Embargo NEW YORK, United States of America, September 9, 2024/ — The Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), warring parties responsible for widespread war crimes and other atrocities in the current conflict in Sudan, have newly acquired modern foreign-made weapons and military equipment, Human Rights Watch said in areport released today.The United Nations Security Council should renew and expand the arms embargo and its restrictions on the Darfur region to all of Sudan and hold violators to account.“Sudan’s conflict is one of the world’s worst humanitarian and human rights crises, with warring parties committing atrocities with impunity, and newly acquired weapons and equipment are likely to be used in the commission of further crimes,” said Jean-Baptiste Gallopin, senior crisis, conflict, and arms researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Fighters from both the SAF and the RSF have since mid-2023 posted photos and videos of new foreign-made kits, such as armed drones and anti-tank guided missiles.”
Human Rights Watch analyzed 49 photos and videos, most apparently filmed by fighters from both sides, posted on the social media platforms Facebook, Telegram, TikTok, and X (formerly known as Twitter), showing weapons used or captured in the conflict. The apparently new equipment that Human Rights Watch identified, which includes armed drones, drone jammers, anti-tank guided missiles, truck-mounted multi-barrel rocket launchers, and mortar munitions, was produced by companies registered in China, Iran, Russia, Serbia
, and the UAE. Human Rights Watch was not able to establish how the warring parties acquired the new equipment. The new visual evidence of equipment not known to previously be in the possession of Sudanese actors, and evidence that it is being used, suggests that the warring parties acquired some of these weapons and equipment after the start of the current conflict in April 2023. In one case, lot numbers indicate the ammunition was manufactured in 2023.
Since the conflict between the SAF and the RSF began in Sudan in April 2023, countless civilians have been killed, millions have been internally displaced, and millions face famine. The SAF and the RSF may use such weapons and equipment to continue to commit war crimes and other serious human rights violations not just in Darfur, but across the country.
The United Nations Security Council is expected to decide on September 11 whether to renew the Sudan sanctions regime, which prohibits the transfer of military equipment to the Darfur region. The sanctions regime was established in 2004, when Darfur was the epicenter of a conflict with widespread human rights abuses, war crimes, and ethnic cleansing. Since April 2023, the new conflict has affected most of Sudan’s states, but Security Council members have yet to take steps to expand the arms embargo to the whole country.
These findings demonstrate both the inadequacy of the current Darfur-only embargo and the grave risks posed by the acquisition of new weapons by the warring parties. A countrywide arms embargo would contribute to addressing these issues by facilitating the monitoring of transfers to Darfur and preventing the legal acquisition of weapons for use in other parts of Sudan.
The Sudanese government has opposed an expansion of the arms embargo and in recent months has lobbied members of the Security Council to end the sanctions regime and remove the Darfur embargo altogether.
The prevalence of atrocities by the warring parties creates a real risk that weapons or equipment acquired by the parties would most likely be used to perpetuate serious violations of human rights and humanitarian law, harming civilians.
Two verified videos filmed by drones and posted on pro-SAF social media accounts show the drones attacking unarmed people in civilian clothes in Bahri (Khartoum North), one of Khartoum’s twin cities. One video, posted to X by a pro-SAF account on January 14, shows a drone dropping two mortar projectiles on apparently unarmed people in civilian clothes as they cross a street in Bahri, killing one person on the spot and leaving four others motionless after the explosions.
Another video, posted to a pro-SAF account on March 19, 2024, shows a drone dropping a munition on people wearing civilian clothes who are loading a truck with apparent sacks of grain or flour in the busy courtyard of the Seen flour mills in Bahri, injuring or killing a man who lies motionless on the floor. No weapons or military equipment are seen near the targeted areas in either video.
Ending the arms embargo would end the work of the Panel of Experts on the Sudan. The panel is one of the few entities that provides the Security Council with regular, in-depth reporting on the conflict in Sudan since the SAF-aligned government successfully demanded the closure of the United Nations Integrated Transition Assistance Mission in Sudan in December 2023.
In recent weeks, the discussion around renewal at the Security Council has shifted toward a renewal of the Darfur embargo and associated sanctions regime, which means, if adopted, the status quo would continue.
The Sudan sanctions regime has faced challenges since its inception. The Panel of Experts and Amnesty International have documented that the governments of Belarus, China, and Russia violated the embargo for years, yet only one individual has ever been sanctioned for violating the embargo. In a report published in July, Amnesty International found that “recently manufactured weapons and military equipment from countries such as Russia, China, Türkiye, and the UAE are being imported in large quantities into Sudan, and then diverted into Darfur.”
At a minimum, the Security Council should proceed with the planned “technical rollover” and maintain the existing Sudan sanctions regime, which, despite its limitations, provides the UN and Security Council members with crucial reporting and tools for sanctions. It should also take more robust actions in the face of violations of the existing embargo, notably by sanctioning the individuals and entities violating it.
“The Security Council should expand the Darfur arms embargo to all of Sudan to curb the flow of arms that may be used to commit war crimes,” Gallopin said. “The Security Council should publicly condemn individual governments that are violating the existing arms embargo on Darfur and take urgently needed measures to sanction individuals and entities that are violating the embargo.”
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Human Rights Watch (HRW).
SOURCE
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
What can PR learn from the public sector’s approach to equality?
Ruby Kite, talent and inclusion lead at The PHA Group
Public relations and comms agencies, among most other private sector companies, take pride in adopting ways of working that benefit clients, customers and employees.
Meanwhile, public sector organisations are considered bound by bureaucracy, which contrasts with the fast-paced world that is agency life.
Its entirely possible that red rape restricts progress, but perhaps the private sector should look to implement some of the government-enforced measures that positively impact those from underrepresented or disadvantaged groups?
Avoid ticking a box
With equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) initiatives at risk of being a box-ticking exercises, agencies should consider equality impact assessments (EIA) as a blueprint for change, following in the footsteps of their public sector counterparts.
An EIA is a systematic process used to evaluate the effects of policies, procedures, or practices on different groups of people, ensuring that no group is disproportionately disadvantaged. They are widely adopted across the public sector as a way of facilitating and evidencing compliance with the Public Sector Equality Duty, part of the Equality Act 2010.
The process typically involves:
-
Identifying purpose and objectives
-
Gathering and analysing relevant data to assess its potential impact on various social identity groups
-
Consulting with stakeholders to gather insights and feedback
-
Developing strategies to mitigate identified negative effects
-
Continuous monitoring and reviewing to ensure ongoing fairness and inclusivity.
To ensure practising what you preach, PR and comms agencies should consider the breadth of policies, processes, and practices that could benefit from implementing EIAs, or a comparable methodology. For example, by prioritising data collection and analysis, they could better evaluate the impact of their campaigns on their target demographic, rather than relying on an inflated figure indicating potential reach via the media. A more proactive approach could be to make data-driven decisions during the campaign planning process rather than wait until it has already hit the press.
Benefit from improved EDI
Many well-known consumer brands make PR blunders and face backlash from members of the impacted audience and their allies, so agencies would benefit from using relevant insights to help mitigate any potentially harmful messaging. The same could also be carried out internally through employee surveys, anonymous feedback options, employee resource groups forums, and stay and exit interviews, to name a few.
Questions to consider are:
- Does your new hybrid working policy impact full-time and part-time employees equitably?
- Is the number of employees affected by redundancies fair across all social identity groups, bearing in mind their representation across the agency?
- Can all employees benefit from salary benchmarking and bonus awards equally?
For agencies with plenty of room for improvement that don’t know where to start, it’s worth a reminder of the nine protected characteristics that should be the focus of EIAs:
- Age
- Disability
- Gender reassignment
- Marriage and civil partnership
- Pregnancy and maternity
- Race
- Religion or belief
- Sex
- Sexual orientation
However, it’s worth bearing in mind that these traits do not take into account other factors that agency leaders may wish to consider, such as socio-economic background, caregiver status, education, neurodivergence, cultural background, and immigration status.
With pressure mounting for agencies to create and maintain truly diverse, inclusive, and equitable environments for its employees, while ensuring the client work is also reflective of its ED&I-related values, it can be a challenge for leaders to continuously improve their agency’s policies and practices for the benefit of both. EIAs provide a structured template to reduce the risk of underrepresented being disproportionately disadvantaged.
Written by
Ruby Kite, talent and inclusion lead at The PHA Group















